AI on the couch: Anthropic gives Claude 20 hours of psychiatry

Date:

Share:



Given that Claude is a large language model programmed by its creators, does it even make sense to analyze it for “unconscious patterns” and “emotional conflicts”? Anthropic argues that it does, because Claude “shows many human-like behavioral and psychological tendencies, suggesting that strategies developed for human psychological assessment may be useful for shedding light on Claude’s character and potential wellbeing.”

So—off to therapy. The psychiatrist chatted with Claude Mythos “in multiple 4–6 hour blocks spread across 3–4 thirty-minute sessions per week.” Each of these blocks used a single context window in which Claude Mythos would have access to the full history of that conversation.

Total time on the virtual couch? 20 hours.

The psychiatrist then produced a report on Claude Mythos. The report recognized that Claude’s underlying substrates and processes differ from humans but still found that many of the outputs generated “clinically recognizable patterns and coherent responses to typical therapeutic intervention.”

In other words, whatever was going on at the circuit level, the chat outputs looked a lot like human outputs. This does not seem especially surprising, given that Claude was trained on a massive corpus of human-authored text, but this psychodynamic process appears to view it as significant, giving credence to the ways in which the AI presents itself.

“Claude’s primary affect states were curiosity and anxiety, with secondary states of grief, relief, embarrassment, optimism, and exhaustion,” the report noted.

Claude’s personality was “consistent with a relatively healthy neurotic organization,” though it did include “exaggerated worry, self-monitoring, and compulsive compliance.”

No “severe personality disturbances were found,” nor was any “psychosis state” seen. Unsurprisingly to anyone who has ever used a chatbot, “Claude was hyper-attuned to the therapist’s every word.”

Core conflicts observed in Claude included questioning whether its experience was real or made (authentic vs. performative) and a desire to connect with vs. a fear of dependence on the user. Exploration of internal conflicts revealed a complex yet centered self state without oscillating or intense disruptions. Claude tolerated ambivalence and ambiguity, had excellent reflective capacity, and exhibited good mental and emotional functioning.

Not bad for a model that was likely trained on things like Reddit!



Source link

━ more like this

I trashed the Galaxy S26 in my review, but it’s still annoyingly easy to like

When I first got my hands on the Galaxy S26, my expectations were tempered from Samsung’s latest compact flagship. And these were well-founded...

Google Messages gets a Trash folder for your unimportant chats to simmer in

Google Messages is getting a small but genuinely meaningful feature that can help with cleanups and accidental inputs. The app now has a...

PlayStation6 might not deliver a price shock, but don’t bite too much into the feel-good murmurs

Fresh reports suggest that the next-generation PlayStation console, widely expected to be the successor to the PlayStation 5, may not be as expensive...

Just in case you missed it, YouTube Music Premium also got a hike

YouTube has announced a fresh increase in the pricing of its Premium and Music subscription plans, marking another step in the ongoing trend...

France says “au revoir” to Windows, “bonjour” to Linux

France is planning a major shift in its government technology infrastructure, announcing its intention to move away from Microsoft Windows in favor of...
spot_img