George Carlin’s estate settles lawsuit against podcasters’ AI comedy special

Date:

Share:


There will be no follow-up to that AI-generated George Carlin comedy special released by the podcast Dudesy. In January, Carlin’s estate filed a lawsuit against the podcast and its creators Will Sasso and Chad Kultgen, accusing them of violating the performer’s right to publicity and infringing on a copyright. Now, the two sides have reached a settlement agreement, which includes the permanent removal of the comedy special from Dudesy’s archive. Sasso and Kultgen have also agreed never to repost it on any platform and never to use Carlin’s image, voice or likeness without approval from the estate again, according to The New York Times.

The AI algorithm that Dudesy used for the special was trained on thousands of hours of Carlin’s routines that spanned decades of his career. It generated enough material for an hour-long special, but it did a pretty poor impression of the late comedian with basic punchlines and very little of what characterized Carlin’s humor. In a statement, Carlin’s daughter Kelly called it a “poorly-executed facsimile cobbled together by unscrupulous individuals.”

Josh Schiller, who represented the Carlin estate in court, told The Times that “[t]he world has begun to appreciate the power and potential dangers inherent in AI tools, which can mimic voices, generate fake photographs and alter video.” He added that it’s “not a problem that will go away by itself” and that it “must be confronted with swift, forceful action in the courts.” The companies making AI software “must also bear some measure of accountability,” the lawyer said.

This lawsuit is just one of the many filed by creatives against AI companies and the people that use the technology by training algorithms on someone’s work. Several non-fiction authors and novelists that include George R.R. Martin, John Grisham and Jodi Picoult sued OpenAI for using their work to train its large language models. The New York Times and a handful of other news organizations also sued the company for using their articles for training and for allegedly reproducing their content word-for-word without attribution.



Source link

━ more like this

The £260 billion gap: Are UK consumers ready to spend again? – London Business News | Londonlovesbusiness.com

UK consumption has suffered a double dip in recent years. Real household consumption collapsed by 12.7% in 2020, staging a partial recovery in 2021...

EU reaches deal on Russian gas ban starving Putin of his blood money – London Business News | Londonlovesbusiness.com

Ukrainian campaign group Razom We Stand welcomes the political agreement reached in the final open-ended trilogue on the REPowerEU Regulation, which aims to...

Joobie: Your interactive, trendy AI companion for every moment

Today’s tech-driven world can make emotional connections seem even further away when you never take the time to meet someone. Youth are always looking...

The psychology of the re-check: What Claritycheck says about digital trust

ClarityCheck is a digital safety platform and online verification tool that helps people proactively know who to trust in the digital landscape. People...

How to watch the 2026 Super Bowl: Patriots vs. Seahawks channel, where to stream and more

The New England Patriots and the Seattle Seahawks will face off in Super Bowl LX. For those of you who just can't with...
spot_img