Uber was found not responsible by a California jury for an sexual assault that a woman said occurred during a 2016 ride, The New York Times reported. It’s the first of what could be thousands of similar lawsuits in the US from women who claim they were “kidnapped, sexually assaulted, sexually battered, raped, falsely imprisoned, stalked, harassed, or otherwise attacked” by Uber drivers, according to the original claim. The cases were consolidated, meaning they can be presented before the same judge with similar procedural processes, while still being tried individually.
The woman in the first case, identified as Jessica C., said she was an 18-year-old college student when she ordered a ride to San Jose’s airport. Shortly after she got in, the driver deviated from his route and climbed on top of her, groped and kissed her and tried to remove her pants, according to her testimony. The victim told the driver “No, no, no” and tried to push him off. She feared for her life and later dropped out of school, while suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder due to the assault.
Under California law, Uber would be responsible for the harm suffered by the woman if it failed to use adequate safety measures and that negligence was a “substantial factor” in causing the harm. Conversely, for Uber to not be responsible, the jury would need to find that Uber didn’t know and could not have expected that its driver would take advantage of the situation that it created.
The jury ruled that while Uber was negligent, that negligence was not a substantial factor in causing harm to Jessica C. However, the plaintiff’s attorney said that the court allowed evidence into the trial that let Uber blame Jessica C. for the harm she faced, adding that the decision discourages victims of sexual assault to come forward. “[It’s a] sad day for victims of sexual abuse across the country,” said John Taylor of Taylor & Ring.
Jessica C.’s lawyers accused Uber of covering up the scale of its sexual assault problem, revealing during discovery that 558,000+ trips had resulted in reports of sexual assault or misconduct from 2017 to 2024, far more than what was publicly reported. They also said that the company failed to put systems in place like mandatory video recording that could have protected passengers.
Uber said that the driver in Jessica C.’s case had passed background checks and didn’t trigger any alarms over past complaints. The company said that despite deploying numerous safety measures, it couldn’t guarantee that driver transgressions would never occur, and that it wasn’t responsible for driver misconduct in any case. Uber’s safety head, Gus Fuldner, testified during the trial that passengers used the service at their own risk.
Uber told the NYT that its work “to improve safety on our platform is never done. Uber has worked for years to raise the bar on safety, and we’ll continue to do so in the years ahead.”
