UK government delays AI copyright rules amid artist outcry

The UK government is working on a controversial data bill that would allow AI companies like Google and OpenAI to train their models on copyrighted materials without consent. However, following a two month consultation, it looks like passage of the law will be delayed. “Copyright is going to be kicked down the road,” a person with knowledge of the matter told The Financial Times.

Responses by stakeholders during the consultation period weren’t favorable to any of the government’s proposed ideas for use of copyrighted materials, the FT‘s sources said. There’s no expectation now that an AI bill will be part of the King’s Speech set for May this year.

As a result, Ministers have decided to go back to the drawing board and spend more time exploring other options. The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee called on the government to develop a licensing-first regime “underpinned by robust transparency that safeguards creators’ livelihoods while supporting sustainable AI growth.”

The UK parliament’s preferred position on the bill (also argued by tech giants like Google) has been that copyright holders need to formally opt-out if they don’t want their materials used to train AI models. However, publishers, filmmakers, musicians and others have said that this would be impractical and an existential threat to the UK’s creative industries.

The House of Lords took the side of artists and introduced an amendment that would require tech companies to disclose which copyright-protected works were used to train AI models. That addition, however, was blocked by the UK’s House of Commons in May last year.

The UK’s majority Labour government — already under fire for its handling of the economy — has taken hits from publishers, musicians, authors and other creative groups over the proposed law. Elton John called the government “absolute losers” while Paul McCartney said that AI has its uses but “it shouldn’t rip creative people off.” McCartney and others artists were part of a “silent album” meant to show the impact of IP theft by AI.

Baroness Beeban Kidron from the House of Lords has also ripped the government over the AI bill. “Creators do not deny the creative and economic value of AI, but we do deny the assertion that we should have to build AI for free with our work, and then rent it back from those who stole it,” she said last year. “It’s astonishing that a Labour government would abandon the labor force of an entire section.”